Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 112316 (ALL)

RAM VISHAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

A483/2483/2024 · 2025-04-28

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72809 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 2483 of 2024 Applicant :- Ram Vishal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No.4558 of 2017 arising out of case crime no.275 of 2014, under Sections 419, 420 IPC, Police Station Bindki, District Fatehpur pending in the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.) / F.T.C., Fatehpur, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the informant in this case. The case is running at the stage of appearance of the accused persons. Despite several process issued against the accused persons, they are not appearing before the court. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 5. The present case is pending for appearance of accused persons but they are not appearing despite several process sent to them. The court has ample power under the law to pass suitable and effective order to ensure the compliance of its own order and to ensure the service of the process sent to the opposite parties under its name. 6. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to procure the appearance of the accused persons of this case as per law within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it. It is also directed that on the date fixed by the trial court all the accused persons shall appear before the Court and no adjournment or exemption for appearance will normally be granted to the accused persons on any ground whatsoever and thereafter all endeavours shall be made by it for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid case, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 ss Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad