Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11231 (RAJ)

UMESH S/O SHYAM SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3701/2025 · 2025-04-08

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3701/2025 1. Umesh S/o Shyam Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Sarkanya Banjaron Ka Kheda, Police Station Mishroli, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub- Jail Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar). 2. Nirmal S/o Badrilal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Sarkanya Banjaron Ka Kheda, Police Station Mishroli, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub- Jail Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar). 3. Udai Singh S/o Chandra Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Sarkanya Banjaron Ka Kheda, Police Station Mishroli, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub- Jail Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 08/04/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0024/2025 registered at Police Station-Mishroli, District-Jhalawar for offences under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 121(1), 132, 109(1), 221, 296(a) of BNS and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3701/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are falsely been implicated in this case and there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. The petitioners are behind the Bar since 24.02.2025 and they have not inflected any grievous injury to the injured person. The offences are triable by Magistrate and trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-(1) Umesh S/o Shyam Singh (2) Nirmal S/o Badrilal and (3) Udai Singh S/o Chandra Singh shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.0024/2025 registered at Police Station- Mishroli, District-Jhalawar on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Sunita/137