Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11230 (ALL)

RAMASHRAY SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/961/2025 · 2025-01-24

Prakash Padia

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:12618 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 961 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramashray Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamlesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Harsh Vardhan Gupta Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Heard Sri Kamlesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 & Sri Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 & 3. 2. The petitioner has preferred the present petition with the following prayers:- 1.Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 District Basic Education Officer, District Kaushambi to pay the arrears of salary to the petitioner for the period 09.11.1997 to 31.3.1998 and 01.04.2007 to 01.06.2008 and arrears of suspension allowance w.e.f. 1.4.1998 to 1.1.2003 with 18% interest. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the order dated 05.04.2008, the petitioner was permitted to join his duties with the rider that final decision be taken in the matter. After final judgement has been delivered by this Court in Criminal Appeal No.2999 of 2007 (Ramashray Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others) on 20.08.2015 and thereafter various representations were made by the petitioner before the respondent Nos.2 & 3 but till date not decision has been taken in the matter. 4. On the other hand, it is argued by Sri Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents that in case, the petitioner will submit fresh representation before the respondent No.2/District Basic Education Officer, Kaushambi, he will take a decision in the matter expeditiously. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to submit a representation ventilating all his grievances before the respondent No.2/District Basic Education Officer, Kaushambi within a period of three weeks from today along with certified copy of this order and earlier representation submitted by him. In case, the petitioner will file the representation within stipulated period, the respondent No.2 will pass appropriate orders on the same within a period of three months thereafter. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 saqlain Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad