IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.138 of 2025 ====================================================== Rama Ahlad Tiwary @ Ram Ahaled Tiwary S/o Late Rambachchan Tiwary, resident of village - Chandralaya, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. Vinod Tiwary S/o Ram Ahlad Tiwary, resident of village and P.O. - Chandralaya, P.S. - Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali. 2. Kumud Tiwari, S/o Ram Ahlad Tiwary resident of village and P.O. - Chandralaya, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali. 3. Manoj Tiwari, S/o Ram Ahlad Tiwary resident of village and P.O. - Chandralaya, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali. 4. Dablu Tiwari, S/o Ram Ahlad Tiwary resident of village and P.O. - Chandralaya, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali. 5. Santosh Tiwari, S/o Late Shivchandra Tiwari, resident of village and P.O. - Chandralaya, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali. 6. Sitesh Tiwary, S/o Late Shivchandra Tiwari, resident of village and P.O. - Chandralaya, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali. 7. Rahul Tiwari, S/o Late Ravindra Tiwari, resident of village and P.O. - Chandralaya, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali. 8. Raushan Tiwary, S/o Late Ravindra Tiwari, resident of village and P.O. - Chandralaya, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali. 9. Mostt. Rita Devi, W/o Late Ravindra Tiwary, resident of village and P.O. - Chandralaya, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Bhola Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 16-10-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present appeal has been preferred for the following relief(s): “That this appeal is directed against the order dated 27.9.2024 passed by the learned Sub- Judge-14, Vaishali, Hajipur in Partition Suit NO. Patna High Court MA No.138 of 2025(3) dt.16-10-2025 2/2 327/2024 whereby while disposing of petition under order XXXIX Rule 1 C.P.C. filed by defendant no. 5 and 6 the learned Sub-Judge directed the parties to maintain status quo over the land in question till appearance of all unappeared parties and any contravention or disobedience of order will be considered as contempt of court and appropriate legal action shall be taken for such disobedience and further directed the parties to get the suit disposed off at the earliest.” 3. Mr. Bhola Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant, after some arguments, prays for withdrawal of the petition. 4. Permission accorded. 5. Accordingly, the MA No. 138 of 2025 as also Interlocutory Application, if any, stand dismissed as withdrawn. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U