JEENA SIKHO LIFECARE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
CWP/17309/2025 · 2025-10-27
Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 112280 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 112280 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Jeena Sikho Lifecare Limited Union of India
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Mr. Vineet Kumar Jakhar
for the petitioner.
Mr. Prashant Rana, Jr. Standing Counsel,
for the respondents.
DEEPAK SIBAL
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition to enable the petitioner to avail of the statutory remedy available to it against the impugned order under Section 107(1) of the C and Services T Services Tax Rules, 2017.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
October 27, 202 vandana
Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.126
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17309 Date of Decision :
Jeena Sikho Lifecare Limited
Versus Union of India and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Vineet Kumar Jakhar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Prashant Rana, Jr. Standing Counsel, for the respondents.
*** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition to enable the petitioner to avail of the statutory remedy available to it against the impugned order under Section 107(1) of the C Tax Act, 2017 read with Rule 108 Rules, 2017. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(DEEPAK SIBAL
JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI)
JUDGE
, 2025
ther speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 7309 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.10.2025
…Petitioner
…Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI , Advocate, Mr. Prashant Rana, Jr. Standing Counsel,
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition to enable the petitioner to avail of the statutory remedy available to it against the impugned order under Section 107(1) of the Central Goods read with Rule 108 of the Central Goods and Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
(LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE
VANDANA 2025.10.28 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document