Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11228 (JHR)

MINA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/862/2025 · 2025-08-01

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC: 21533 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.862 of 2025 Mina Devi, aged about 51 years, W/o – Late Shankar lal, Resident of Village – D/11-06, Mosabani, P.O. - Mosabani No.1, & P.S. - Mosabani, District – East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur. …… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Sri Ananya Mittal S/o not known to the petitioner, Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, P.O- Sakchi P.S – Sakchi, District – East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur. …... Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Amit, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy, A.C to G.A-III -------- 02/Dated: 01 st August, 2025 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for non- compliance of the order dated 29.07.2024, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.507 of 2022. 2. The operating portion, i.e., paragraph No.04 of the order dated 29.07.2024 reads as under:- “4. In view of the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is, hereby, disposed of directing the petitioner to approach the concerned authority and the concerned authority is directed to consider the claim of the petitioner in accordance with the relevant policy/ circular/ law, applicable in this regard. The decision must be taken by the authority concerned as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight weeks from the date of receipt/ production of copy of this order .” 3. A show cause has been filed by the opposite parties bringing on record a reasoned order dated 28.04.2025, passed in Misc. Case No.01/ 2024-25, whereby the claim of the petitioner has been rejected. 4. In that view of the matter, the present contempt petition - 1 - Cont. Case (C) No.862 of 2025 2025:JHHC: 21533 is, hereby, disposed of reserving liberty with the petitioner to work out her further remedy in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid liberty, the present contempt petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Ravi-Chandan/- - 2 - Cont. Case (C) No.862 of 2025