Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11227 (UTT)

VISARAT ALIAS BISARAT AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/464/2024 · 2025-04-23

Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3038 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc Application No. 464 of 2024 23 April, 2025 Visarat alias Bisarat & Ors. --Petitioners Versus State Of Uttarakhand & Anr. --Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Shakib Husain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Bisht, Deputy A.G. with Mr. Akshay Latwal, A.G.A. for the State. Mr. Faizan Ali, Advocate for respondent no.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. (Oral) By means of present petition, petitioners seek to quash the charge-sheet and the cognizance orders dated 10.02.2023 and 03.05.2023 passed by A.C.J.M., Roorkee, District Haridwar as well as the entire proceedings of S.T. No.44 of 2023 “State vs. Bisarat” and S.T. No.83 of 2023 “State vs. Azam and another” (leading S.T. No.53 of 2023), under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506, 34 of IPC, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. In view of the fact that a Compounding Application was filed by the parties before this Court, this Court, vide order dated 09.04.2025, had directed the parties to appear before the Secretary, DLSA, Haridwar to get their statements recorded and to verify the compromise deed. 3. Pursuant to such order, Secretary, DLSA, Haridwar has submitted report dated 15.04.2025 which indicates that the 1 2025:UHC:3038 parties have settled the dispute amicably and have also verified the contents of the compromise. 4. In view of the above, Compounding Application IA No.1/2024 is allowed. As a consequence thereof, impugned charge-sheet and the cognizance orders dated 10.02.2023 and 03.05.2023 passed by A.C.J.M., Roorkee, District Haridwar as well as the entire proceedings of S.T. No.44 of 2023 “State vs. Bisarat” and S.T. No.83 of 2023 “State vs. Azam and another” (leading S.T. No.53 of 2023) under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506, 34 of IPC, are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of, on the basis of compromise/settlement arrived at between the parties. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 23.04.2025 Rajni 2 RAJINI GUSAIN Digitally signed by RAJINI GUSAIN DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=97cfa6e4cbd49c07b876db48448ac3701 a9ae475a2547e4b7f1d9b1f17d01342, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=8D039BC77BD1A2222B4DF4FC80 D4557562F95BEBA013F530616A158A0A878BD8, cn=RAJINI GUSAIN Date: 2025.04.24 17:32:58 +05'30'