Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11227 (JHR)

PREMRANJAN KUMAR PODDAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

C.M.P./590/2025 · 2025-07-18

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:19747 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 590 of 2025 Premranjan Kumar Poddar, S/o Late Ayodhya Poddar, R/o village Baurma, PO Bajitpur, P.S.-Meharma, District-Godda (Jharkhand) ..... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Chairman, Jharkhand State Electricity Board, Engineering House, HEC, Dhruwa, P.O. + P.S.-Dhurwa, Ranchi-834004 3. The General Manager, NESCL, NTPC, P.S. Godda, District-Godda (Jharkhand) 4. The Deputy Manager, NESCL, NTPC, P.S. Godda, District-Godda (Jharkhand) 5. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, P.O. Godda , District-Godda (Jharkhand) 6. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Mahagama, P.O.-Mahagama, District-Godda (Jharkhand) 7. The Executive Engineer, Public Health Department, P.O. & P.S.-Godda District-Godda (Jharkhand) … …. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ravi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rahul Kamlesh, AC to SC-IV For JUVNL : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Sr. SC Mr. Rakesh Kumar Roy, Advocate ------ Order No. 04 / Dated : 18.07.2025. The instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed for restoration of W.P. (C) No. 5324 of 2013 which was dismissed on 26.08.2015 for non-compliance of the order dated 19.08.2015, whereas the restoration application has been filed on 22.03.2025. It is submitted by learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is a retired bank employee and dismissal of earlier writ petition was not communicated to him by the conducting counsel. Learned counsel on behalf of the respondent nos. 2, 5, 6 and 7 submits that there is an inordinate delay of about ten years in preferring the instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition. Considering the inordinate delay in preferring the instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition for restoration, the instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Pawan/ -