IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19755 of 2016 ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar Jha son of Late Kamal Jha, resident of Vill- Mahinathpur, PO- Mehath, PS- Bhairavsthan, Dist- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar and Ors 2. The Secretary, Department of Road Construction, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Land Acquisition Officer D.L.A.O., Madhubani. 4. The Block Development Officer, B.D.O., Jhanjharpur, Madhubani. 5. The Circle Officer C.O., Jhanjharpur, Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sushil Kumar-Gp22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 24-11-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s): (i) For issuance of appropriate writ/s, direction/s, and order/s in the nature of "Certiorari" for setting-aside the impugned memo No.-33 dated 14.01.2016 issued under signature of the District Land Acquisition Officer (D.L.A.O.), Madhubani (Respondent No.-3) whereby and whereunder the petitioner was cautioned to refund the compensation amount of Rs. 8,14,489 with nine percent interest within the forthnight otherwise certificate case will be filed Patna High Court CWJC No.19755 of 2016(2) dt.24-11-2025 2/2 against the petitioner. (ii) For issuance of appropriate Writ/s, Direction/s, and Order/s in the nature of "Mandamas" for directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 9.2.2016 and further not to harras and take any actions against the petitioner taking the law in hand arbitrarily and whimscally. (iii) For issuance of any other appropriate Order/s, Writ/s, Direction/s for which the petitioner is found to be entitled in the given facts and circumstances of the case. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequently, development took place, a certificate proceeding came up, challenged, the writ petition stood disposed of by a Division Bench in CWJC No. 10915 of 2019 on 15.11.2022. 4. His contention is that considering the aforesaid development, the writ petition has become infructuous. 5. As such, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U