Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11225 (AP)

MULE PAPPI REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/6955/2025 · 2025-03-19

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6955 OF 2025 Between: Mule Pappi Reddy, S/o. Konda Reddy, Aged 62 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o. Petiuru Village, Kondepi Mandal, Prakasam District. ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. The Station House officer, Kondepi Police Station, Kondepi, Prakasam District. Mule Rami Reddy, S/o. Kesi Reddy, R/o. Petiuru Village, Kondepi Mandal, Prakasam District. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly 4th respondent at the instance of 5'^ Respondent in harassing the petitioner by frequently summoning to attend before him and insisting him to vacate from his legitimate property of land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.37 cents covered by S.No.463/1A5 situated at Petiuru Revenue Village of Kondepi Mandal in Prakasam District, as illegal, irregular and irrational and issued without any authority of law and violative and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents, particularly 4*' respondent not to interfere in any manner with his possession over his said landed property. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 of Articles 14 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly 4 insist the petitioner to appear before his authority nor interfere in any manner with his peaceful possession and enjoyment over his property admeasuring an extent of Ac. Ac.0.37 cents covered by S.No. 463/1A5 situated at Petiuru Revenue Village of Kondepi Mandal in Prakasam District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. respondent not to Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010129162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] 0? WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6955/2025 Between; Mule Pappi Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT{S) 1.NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No. 4 the behest of the 5“^ respondent, is disturbing the peace of the petitioner. at 2. The learned Assistant Government Pteader submits that the 4^*^ respondent is not interfering with the peace of the petitioner. 3. Considering the same, this Court is inclined to dispose off the writ petition at the admission stage by directing the 4‘^ respondent not to disturb the peace of the petitioner without following the due process of law. > 2 With these observations, this Writ Petition is disposed off. No costs. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC FFICER To, Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. DiSr^r'^^ Station, Kondepi, Prakasam 5. One CC to M/s. Nimmagadda Revathi, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 7. Three C.D. Copies. [OUT] Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:19/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.6955 of 2025 t m APR 2025 s Current Section DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS