Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11224 (GAU)

NOZMUL ISLAM AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS

WP(C)/2286/2024 · 2025-04-01

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010066702025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2286/2024 NOZMUL ISLAM AND ANR S/O LATE YUSUF ALI R/O VILL- NAHARPUR P.O.MALUA P.S. BADARPUR DIST. KARIMGNAJ ASSAM PIN-788806 2: BAHARUL ISLAM S/O LATE YUSUF ALI R/O VILL- NAHARPUR PO.O.MALUA P.S. BADARPUR DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788806 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT JANATA BHAWAN (ASSAM SECRETARIAT COMPLEX) DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM POLICE HEAD QUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI-781007. Page No.# 2/4 3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KARIMGANJ 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KARIMGANJ 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BADARPUR REVENUE CIRCLE. 6:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE BADARPUR POLICE STATION KARIMGANJ. 7:MOMOTAZ BEGUM W/O LATE TOJMUL HUSSAIN R/O VILL- NAHARPUR P.O. MALUA P.S. BADARPUR DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788806. 8:ABDUL AHAD S/O LATE ABDUL SUKUR R/O VILL- NAHARPUR P.O. MALUA P.S. BADARPUR DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788806. 9:ABDUL BASIT S/O LATE ABDUL SUKUR R/O VILL- NAHARPUR P.O. MALUA P.S. BADARPUR DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788806. 10:BADRUZZAMAN S/O LATE MOHAMMAD ALI R/O VILL- NAHARPUR P.O. MALUA Page No.# 3/4 P.S. BADARPUR DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788806. 11:NURUZZAMAN S/O LATE MOHAMMAD ALI R/O VILL- NAHARPUR P.O. MALUA P.S. BADARPUR DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788806. ------------ Advocate for : MR A R BHUYAN Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 02-04-2025 Heard Mr. N.Z. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners; Ms. S. Baruah, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 1 – 6; and Mr. A.K. Azad, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 7 – 11. The learned counsel for the parties are heard at some length. Mr. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners has thereafter, submitted that the petitioners want to withdraw the writ petition in order to avail appropriate remedy under the law before the appropriate forum. The submission made by Mr. Choudhury is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Choudhury, learned counsel Page No.# 4/4 for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant