Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11223 (UTT)

REETA DEVI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH DISTRICT MAGISTRATE HARIDWAR

C482/1743/2022 · 2025-08-14

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C482 No.1743 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Ruchika Negi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant, at bar, that this C482 application has rendered infructuous for the reason that the complaint arising out of which this C482 application is filed, has been withdrawn by the respondent- complainant. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, this C482 application is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 14.08.2025 SK