REETA DEVI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH DISTRICT MAGISTRATE HARIDWAR
C482/1743/2022 · 2025-08-14
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11223 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11223 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
C482 No.1743 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Ms. Ruchika Negi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the applicant.
2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant, at bar, that this C482 application has rendered infructuous for the reason that the complaint arising out of which this C482 application is filed, has been withdrawn by the respondent- complainant.
4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, this C482 application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
14.08.2025 SK