Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:42358 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20419 of 2024 Petitioner :- Udal Singh Gautam Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Srivastava,Satyam Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pawan Kumar Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Satyam Sharma, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondents. 2. Petitioner has approached this Court against suspension order dated 05.07.2020 mainly on a ground that despite prolong suspension period, inquiry has not been concluded. 3. Learned counsel for respondents, on instructions, submits that inquiry has been concluded by an order dated 20.03.2025 and a warning has given to petitioner to not to repeat such conduct in future and a copy of same is provided to learned counsel for petitioner during hearing. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner, after perusal of said order, fairly submits that grievance of petitioner has now been addressed, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of with an observation that salary of period under suspension may be given in accordance with law. 5. Learned counsel for respondents submits that legal consequence shall be followed in pursuance of order dated 20.03.2025. 6. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner submits that a liberty be granted to petitioner if he is still aggrieved by order dated 20.03.2025 and may take available legal recourse. 7. In view of above, since inquiry against petitioner has been concluded with a warning, therefore, prayer to quash the suspension order has been rendered infructuous. 8. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 24.3.2025 Sinha_N. Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad