Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11217 (UTT)

PRIYANSHU KAUSHIK v. THE NAINITAL BANK LTD

WPSS/1508/2025 · 2025-09-12

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:8139 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/1508/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. 3. Petitioner has challenged an order of punishment passed by Disciplinary Authority on 30.11.2024. 4. From perusal of the record, it is revealed that petitioner filed Appeal against the said punishment order, therefore, petitioner has also sought a direction to the Appellate Authority to decide the pending Appeal. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the bank/employer, however, submits that decision on petitioner’s Appeal, has been taken by the Chief Operating Officer of the bank on 15.04.2025. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner therefore seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the order passed by Disciplinary Authority and Appellate Authority in appropriate proceedings. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 12.09.2025 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df 006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA87 5643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.09.12 17:02:57 +05'30'