Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11217 (KAR)

LAXMAN v. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ORS

WP/202051/2024 · 2025-04-16

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2344 WP No. 202051 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.202051 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: LAXMAN S/O. SHARANAPPA NADUGIRI, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC: PUMP OPERATOR, KODLAHANAGARGA GRAM PANCHAYAT, KODLAHANAGARGA, TQ: ALAND, DIST: KALABURAGI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. I.R. BIRADAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYAT, KALABURAGI – 585 101. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUKA PANCHAYAT, ALAND, DIST: KALABURAGI – 585 302. 3. THE P.D.O., KODLAHANGARAGA GRAM PANCHAYAT KODLAHANGARAGA, TQ: ALAND, DIST: KALABURAGI -585 302. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KRUPA SAGAR PATIL, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by VARSHA N RASALKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2344 WP No. 202051 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED:01.08.2016, 14.07.2017 13.11.2017, 30.07.2018, 31.12.2018/04.01.2019, 09.01.2020 AND 27.09.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES VIDE ANNEXURE C,D,E,F,G & G-1 & G-3 AND TO TAKE SUITABLE DECISION IN THE LIGHT OF THE LETTER/ORDER DATED:07.08.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-G2 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) Heard Sri I.R.Biradar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Krupasagar Patil, who represents respondent No.1. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Pump Operator in the year 1995 and he has put up more than 29 years of continuous service. The petitioner is entitled to get promoted as Bill Collector – Grade-II. Though the petitioner submitted several representations to respondent No.1, without - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2344 WP No. 202051 of 2024 consideration they were kept pending. Learned counsel states that no further orders in this writ petition is required except to direct respondent No.1 to consider the representations of the petitioner and pass necessary orders. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.1, Sri Krupasagar Patil states that the representations of the petitioner will be considered. 4. A perusal of the record reveals that the petitioner is submitting his representations continuously to the respondents since 2016. No reason is shown as to why they were not considered and no orders were passed answering the grievance of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court considers desirable to allow the writ petition in the manner indicated hereunder. Thus the writ petition is disposed of with the following : ORDER i. Respondent No.1 – Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Panchayat, Kalaburagi is directed to - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2344 WP No. 202051 of 2024 consider the representations of the petitioner at Annexures-C, D, E, F, G, G1 and G3 and to pass necessary orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. ii. The decision taken be communicated to the petitioner. Sd/- (Dr.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46 CT:NI