IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64899 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2022 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West Champaran ====================================================== DINESHWAR PRASAD GUPTA S/o Late Vishwanath Prasad Gupta R/o Mohalla- kotwali Chowk, Ganj No. 2, P.S.- Bettiah Town, Distt- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Ranjiv Kumar Goyal S/o Sri Rajkishore Prasad Barnwal R/o Mohalla- Naya Bazar, Purani Gudari, Ward no. 10, P.S.- Bettiah Town(Kalibag OP),. Distt- West Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Rakesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24 21-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. FIR No. 87 of 2022, in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 408, 420, 468, 323, 504, 120B of the IPC. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with co-accused person, namely, Sangeeta Gupta (wife of the petitioner), in a deliberate conspiracy, committed fraud and betrayal and defalcated Rs. 28,00,000/-. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64899 of 2022(24) dt.21-11-2025 2/2 4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is in incarceration since 15.06.2022. 5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for O.P. No. 2 have opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that conduct of the petitioner is not fair. The petitioner handed over a cheque of Rs. 13,00,000/- in the Court to the informant on 10.10.2025 but it was dishonoured by the bank. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is also involved in three cases of similar nature. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in my view, the petitioner does not deserve privilege of bail. Accordingly, the present bail application is rejected. 7. The provisional bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 20.04.2023 is hereby recalled and the learned Court below is directed to take all necessary steps to apprehend the petitioner. priyanka/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T