IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 206 CWP-6094-2018 Date of Decision: 07.11.2025 GURMEET SINGH ...Petitioner Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate and Ms. Anju Bansal, Advocate for respondents-U.T. *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents No.1 to 4 to appoint him on compassionate ground. 2. Petitioner’s father was working as Tubewell Operator with Public Health Department, Chandigarh. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent at the outset submits that petitioner has alternative remedy to approach Central Administrative Tribunal. This Court should refrain from passing any order. 4. Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with permission to approach Central Administrative Tribunal. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.11.07 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-6094-2018 -2- 5. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE November 07, 2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.11.07 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document