CHINNAMMA W/O AMRUTHRAO v. TARABAI D/O GUNDAPPA AND ANR
RSA/7371/2013 · 2025-03-05
Anant Ramanath Hegde
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11208 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11208 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:1441 RSA No. 7371 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 7371 OF 2013 (INJ) BETWEEN:
CHINNAMMA W/O AMRUTHRAO AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: BEMALKHEDA VILLAGE, TQ.: HUMNABAD, DIST.: BIDAR – 585 403. …APPELLANT
(BY SMT CHINNAMMA - APPELLANT IS ABSENT)
AND:
1. TARABAI D/O GUNDAPPA PATIL, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: H.NO.9-11-248 SITUATED AT OPP: CHURCH, VIDYANAGAR COLONY, BIDAR – 585 401.
2. SHANTKUMAR S/O AMRUTHRAO AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BEMALKHEDA, TQ.: HUMNABAD DIST: BIDAR – 585 403 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA VAIJANATH, C/R1)
Digitally signed by SHIVAKUMAR HIREMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:1441 RSA No. 7371 of 2013
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.07.2013 PASSED IN R.A.NO.11/2011 BY THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., AT BIDAR, (SIGNED BY THE LEARNED JUDGE SHOWING DESIGNATING AS PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND C.J.M., BIDAR) CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.01.2011 PASSED IN O.S.NO.115/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE BIDAR (SHOWN AS HAVING BEEN PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, BIDAR IN THE JUDGMENT IN R.A.NO.11/2011), AND TO PASS AN APPROPRIATE ORDERS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE)
It is stated that the notice is sent to the appellant by the advocate on record.
2. There is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non – prosecution.
Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
THM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11