Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11207 (HP)

RAJ KUMAR v. ARYA SAMAJ AND OTHERS

CMP.M/640/2024 · 2025-03-17

Bipin Chander Negi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Raj Kumar Vs. Arya Samaj & Ors. CMP(M) No.640 of 2024 17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Shubham Singh Guleria, Advocate, vice Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Shagun Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr. Rishi Tandon, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Mr. Arun Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No.5 and 6. Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.7. No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-applicants. Other than the aforesaid, from the sufficient cause shown in the application, it is evident that the applicant, in the case at hand, was bona fidely and diligently pursuing the remedies available to him under the law. In view thereof, application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Application stands disposed of. RSA No.__________ of 2025 Be registered. List for admission after four weeks. CMP No.__________ of 2025 Be registered. List for consideration along with main matter. (Bipin C. Negi) Judge 17th March, 2025 (Gaurav Rawat)