MEHMOODA BANO v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME)
WP(C)/174/2025 · 2025-11-19
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11206 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11206 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 32 Regular Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 174/2025 CM(343/2025)
MEHMOODA BANO ……...Petitioner(s) Through:
None
Versus UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME). .……Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy. AG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 19.11.2025
1. The record reveals that by virtue of order dated 28.05.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner was
directed to take steps for service of the respondents, failing which, it was made clear that appropriate orders shall follow. Today, when the matter was taken up, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, nor have the requisite steps been taken. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter any further.
2. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE
Srinagar 19.11.2025 Sakeena-PS