Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11205 (UTT)

HARISH CHANDRA SATI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2656/2025 · 2025-09-17

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:8280 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS 2656/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Pavan Kumar Nath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel, for the State. (2) According to petitioner, he made a representation against inclusion of Village Deorada in Nagar Panchayat Tharali, which is pending consideration before the competent authority. (3) Learned State Counsel submits that inclusion of a revenue village within Nagar Panchayat/Nagar Palika is the sole prerogative of the State Government, which has to be exercised as per the provision contained in Municipalities Act. He further submits that he has no objection if the competent authority is directed to look into the matter. (4) Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority in the State to consider the representation made by the petitioner and decide the same, if already not decided, as per law, within six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 17.9.2025 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C919 57BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.09.17 17:56:14 +05'30' 2025:UHC:8280