C.O GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (GIL) ELECTRONICS v. GHULAM NABI DAR
CRM(M)/81/2023 · 2025-11-18
Vinod Chatterji Koul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11205 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11205 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 38 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 81/2023
C.O GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (GIL) ELECTRONICS
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Farhat Zia Soharwardy, Advocate Vs.
GHULAM NABI DAR
...Respondent(s) Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL-JUDGE
ORDER 18.11.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the passage of time, this petition has become infructuous as the complaint filed before the Trial court has been dismissed for non-prosecution. His statement is taken on record. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 18.11.2025
“Imtiyaz”
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 24.11.2025 10:19