Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35796 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46287 of 2024 Applicant :- Anil Kumar Gaur Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Ajay Singh, learned AGA for the State-opposite party and perused the record. 2. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused- applicant, Anil Kumar Gaur, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 307 of 2024, under Sections 317(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 66-D of I.T. Act, Police Station -Alinagar, District -Chandauli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused- applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 17.11.2024. He has no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that no offence as alleged in the FIR has been made out against the applicant. Applicant is only an agent of shop of one Himanshu Singh (who is distributor) and selling sim cards at footpath. There is no recovery of on-line fraud money, forged ID, forged passport, forged KYCE. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. The money was received in the account of co- accused namely Ajay Singh, who has already been released on bail vide order dated 24.02.2025 passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 45989 of 2024. Applicant's case is on better footing than co-accused, who is on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. 5. Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned AGA has vehemently opposed, but could not dispute the fact that applicant has no criminal antecedents. 6. Considering all those facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the accused-applicant, Anil Kumar Gaur, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. 9. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 VS Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad