Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11202 (HP)

JAGAT RAM v. THE HRTC AND ANOTHER

CWP/6092/2025 · 2025-04-11

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.6092 of 2025 Decided on: 11th April, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jagat Ram …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate vice Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate vice Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, learned Standing Counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. The instant petition has been filed praying for a direction to the respondents to release enhanced dearness 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 relief and interim relief with arrears along with interest in favour for the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred to office memorandum dated 07.02.2015 (Annexure P-1), whereunder dearness relief to Himachal Pradesh Government Pensioner/Family Pensioners was revised w.e.f. 01.07.2014. Reliance was also placed upon office memorandum dated 07.03.2020, issued by the Department of Finance, Government of Himachal Pradesh, further revising the dearness relief of Himachal Pradesh Government Pensioners/Family Pensioners w.e.f. 01.07.2019. 5. It is not in dispute that office memorandums dated 07.02.2015 and 07.03.2020 have been adopted by the respondent-Corporation and dearness relief in terms of these office memorandums is admissible to the petitioner, but the same has not been released to him. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to pay due and admissible dearness relief to the petitioner in terms of above office memorandums within a period of six weeks from today. It is, however, made clear that in case due and admissible dearness relief is not paid by the 3 respondents to the petitioner within the aforesaid period, then the same shall be payable with interest @ 5% per annum from the due date till its actual realization. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 11, 2025 Judge Mukesh