SURJIT SINGH ALIAS JEETA ALIAS HARJEET SINGH ALIAS JEETA v. STATE OF PUNJAB
CRM-M/39475/2025 · 2025-11-04
Sanjay Vashisth
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 112017 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 112017 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-
IN 215
Surjit Singh State of Pun
CORAM:
PRESENT:
SANJAY V
1. 2023 (earli petitioner, Information Name o Petitioner (s) Surjit Singh alia Jeeta alia Harjeet Singh alia Jeeta
2. following -39475-2025
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIG
t Singh alias Jeeta alias Harjeet Singh Versus of Punjab
AM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SA SENT: Mr. Hitesh Chopra, Advocate
Ms. Anjali, Advocate,
for the petitioner. Mr. Manjinder S. Bhullar, DAG
Mr. Ankit Bhardwaj, Advocate
Mr. B. S. Jaswal, Advocate, fo **** JAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition, filed u (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for ioner, who has been booked in a cr mation Report, as detailed hereunder: e of tioner FIR No. Date Section(s) h alias a alias h alias 74 02.06.2025
On 28.07.2025, Coordinate B wing order: - F PUNJAB AND HARYANA NDIGARH
CRM-M-39475-2025
Decided on:04.11.202 Singh alias Jeeta . . . Petitioner ersus
. . . Respondent CE SANJAY VASHISTH ocate& r, DAG, Punjab. vocate, with ate, for the complainant. filed under Section 482 of the BNSS is for grant of anticipatory bail to th n a criminal case arising out of Fir nder: -
Police Station District
nate Bench of this Court, passed th
2025 2025 ioner dent BNSS, il to the of First
sed the ANIL KUMAR 2025.11.07 12:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-
-39475-2025
- 2 -
#
&
"
*+ Name & age of Petitioner (s) FIR No. Date Se Surjit Singh alias Jeeta alias Harjeet Singh alias Jeeta 74 02.06.2025
2. Learned counsel for the p the allegations against the p Alias Harjeet Singh Alias J injury to complainant Ajadvin and also to Balkar Singh ove are opined to be simple in na
3. He further points out tha that petitioner was armed wit but in the later part, weapo which creates doubt about th spot. Moreover, petitioner ex investigation, if protected fro
4. Notice of motion. 5. On advance notice, l
! "
$
# #%
' (& ) Section(s) Police Station District
he petitioner, inter alia, contends th he petitioner-Surjit Singh Alias Jee as Jeeta are that he has caused on advinder Singh on the right hand (gu over the left leg and both the injuri n nature.
that in the first part it is mentione d with Kahi (stated to be spade/kass eapon mentioned in his arms is ax ut the presence of the petitioner on th er expressed his inclination to join th d from arrest. e, learned State counsel puts
s that Jeeta d one d (gut) juries tioned kassi), s axe, on the in the ts in ANIL KUMAR 2025.11.07 12:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-
3. contends th Court, peti Therefore,
order.
4.
averment investigatio custodial in investigatio
5.
6.
-39475-2025
- 3 - appearance on behalf of the r
6. Adjourned to 04.11.2025.
7. In the meanwhile, the p investigation as and whe Investigating Agency. In the shall be released on ad-inter bail bonds to the satisfactio petitioner shall also be abid under Section 482(2) of BN Cr.P.C.).
8. Besides, the petitioner wou before the Arresting Officer in case of leaving the Countr from the Investigating Agency
Continuing his submissions, l nds that in compliance of the order t, petitioner has joined the investiga efore, he prays for confirmation of t
Learned State counsel on ent made by learned counsel for tigation on 29.07.2025, by the petitio dial interrogation of the petitioner is tigation.
Heard learned counsel for the p
Since, petitioner has alread the respondent – State.
25. he petitioner is directed to join th when required to do so by th the event of his arrest, the petition interim bail, subject to his furnishin action of the Arresting Officer. Th abide by all the conditions laid dow BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438( would submit/surrender his passpo icer and an undertaking on oath th untry, he would seek prior permissio ency/concerned Court. ions, learned counsel for the petition
order dated 28.07.2025, passed by th vestigation, and has fully co-operate n of the said interim anticipatory ba l on instructions, confirms the sa el for the petitioner of joining th petitioner, and submits that as of now ner is not required for the purpose o or the parties. already joined the investigation an
in the y the itioner ishing r. The down 438(2) ssport th that ission etitioner by this perated. ory bail he said ing the of now, rpose of on and ANIL KUMAR 2025.11.07 12:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-
custodial i 28.07.2025 present peti
and when r down unde
7.
November anil
Whether spe Whether Rep
-39475-2025
- 4 - dial interrogation is no more requi .2025, passed by this Court is here nt petition is allowed.
However, petitioner shall con when required to do so and abide by under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023
Accordingly, petition stands di ember 04, 2025 speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Reportable: Yes/No required; ad-interim bail order date s hereby made absolute. Accordingl ll continue to join the investigation a de by all the terms and conditions la , 2023. nds disposed of.
(SANJAY VASHISTH JUDGE
r dated rdingly, ation as ons laid ISTH) ANIL KUMAR 2025.11.07 12:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document