Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2025 DAILYLAW 112 (MEG)

M/S BAJRANG LOGISTIX PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 6 ORS.

WP(C)/560/2025 · 2026-03-18

H S Thangkhiew

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 02 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 560 of 2025 Date of Decision :18.03.2026 M/s Bajrang Logistix Private Limited Represented by its authorized signatory i.e. Mr. Ayush Dhanania, Director having its registered office At 22, Hemanta Basu Sarani, 6th Floor, Unit-6F, Kolkata, West Bengal-700001. …Petitioner(s) -Versus- 1. State of Meghalaya represented by The Chief Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 2. The Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Housing Department, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 3. The Director, Directorate of Housing, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong-793001. 4. M/s Power Roofing, Umtru Road Village Amjok, Byrnihat, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya-793122 5. M/s Meghalaya Roofing, Industrial Area, Umiam, Meghalaya-793103. 6. Manaksia Aluminium Company Limited, 8/1, Lal Bazar Street, Bikaner Building, Third Floor, Kolkata, West Bengal-700001. 7. M/s Mariem Commerce Limited, Umbir, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya-793101. …Respondent(s) 2026:MLHC:252 ____________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S. Thangkhiew, Judge. Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. Ch. Gautam, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N.D. Chullai, AAG with Ms. Z.E Nongkynrih, GA (For R 1-3) Dr. N. Mozika, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.L. Nongpiur, Adv. (For R 4) i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. The writ petitioner by the instant writ petition has sought for directions to allow it to participate in the tender process based on the directions contained in an order dated 28.08.2025 passed in WA No. 44/2025 and other connected matters with regard to supply or roofing sheets. The writ petitioner however was not a tenderer in the tender process for which NIT had been floated on 10.09.2024. 2. A perusal of the said directions contained in the order referred to above would reflect that the learned Division Bench had only limited the test of eligibility to one Manaksia Aluminum company and M/s Mariem Commerce Limited who were tenderers in the initial round. The writ 2026:MLHC:252 petitioner being a stranger to the proceedings, therefore has no locus to seek participation in the process which was already underway and subject to orders of the Court. Accordingly, there being no ground to sustain the writ petition, the same is dismissed. JUDGE Meghalaya 18.03.2026 “V. Lyndem- PS” 2026:MLHC:252 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2026.03.20 18:27:56 IST