SACHANDEO PRASAD MAHTO ALIAS SACHIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3136/2025 · 2025-04-22
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11199 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11199 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:11880] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3136 of 2025
------ Sachandeo Prasad Mahto @ Sachin, Aged about 30 years, Son of Sri Sukhdeo Mahto, resident of-village- Tangtona, Teliyadih, P.O. and P.S.- Kasmar, District- Bokaro, (Jharkhand)
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Nandan, Advocate
For the State
: Ms. Mohua Palit, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No.02 Dated- 22-04-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jaridih P.S. Case No.160 of 2024 registered under Section 103 (1), 238 and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed murder of an unknown person whose dead body was recovered from a place near Balrampur Karidhundh, Jaridih Bokaro. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that except the confessional statement of the co-accused persons and the petitioner himself, there is no other material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been released on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.02.2025 passed in B.A. No.1518 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.12.2024 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Jaridih P.S. Case No.160 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/