IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6822 OF 2025 Between: 1. M. Sankaramma, W/o. Late Chengalarayulu, @ M. Subramanyam, Aged about 61 years, Occ: House Wife, R/o. D.No. 19-4-84, S.T.V Nagar, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. 2. M. Subbarao, S/o. Late Chengalarayulu, @ M. Subramanyam, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. D.No. 19-4-76, S.T.V Nagar, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. 3. M. Muragaiah, S/o. Late Chengalarayulu, @ M. Subramanyam, Aged about 37 years, Occ: House Wife, R/o. D.No. 19-4-76, S.T.V Nagar, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati District Erstwhile Chittoor District. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District at Tirupati 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Tiruchanoor Police Station, Tirupati District 4. The Station House Officer, Tiruchanoor P.S, Tirupati District 5. Palem Dayakar, S/o. Palem Muthyalaiah, Age Not Known, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nalamani Kalava Village, Tanapalli, Tirupati, Tirupati District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in highhandedly interfering with the civil disputes and peaceful possession and enjoyment % of the petitioners property of an extent of Ac.0.82 cents, situated at Plot No. 131, Sy.No.362-1 of Avilala Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District., on the ascendancy of the Respondent No.5 herein, without having any power or authority or any jurisdiction and threatening to vacate the possession is questioned as the same is arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the well-established legal principles apart from being violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents, not to interfere in petitioners civil disputes regarding the above subject property of an extent of Ac.0.82 cents, situated at Plot No. 131, Sy.No.362-1 of Avilala Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, forthwith. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents, not to interfere in petitioners civil disputes regarding the above subject property of an extent of Ac.0.82 cents, situated at Plot No. 131, Sy.No.362-1 of Avilala Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon’ble court. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : NONE APPEARED The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER APHC010128402025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6822/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER(S) M. Sankaramma and Others AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner{S): 1.SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH. N WRIT PETITON No.6822 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners contends that respondents 3 and 4 are attempting to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioners and the 5 respondent, and that the petitioners are being threatened to vacate the premises. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the police have not intervened in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5 respondent. 4. Upon considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader representing respondents 1 to 4, this Court finds it appropriate to dispose off the writ petition directing the 2 W.P. No.6822 OF 2025 interfere with the civil disputes respondents 3 and 4 not to between the petitioners and the S'" respondent. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off at the stage of admission. No costs. 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in shall stand closed. in this writ petition Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTER SEC^^^l^FlCER //TRUE COPY// To, State of Andhra Pradesh Police, Tirupati District atTirupati. Police Station, Tirupati 2. The Superintendent of 3. The Circle inspector of Police, Tiruchanoor District. 4. Thd Station House Officer , Tiruchanoor P.S, Tirupati District. Reddy Kalava, Advocate [OPUC] Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] One CC to Sri Suresh Kumar GP for Home, High 5. 6. TwoCCsto 7. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:19/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.6822 of 2025 ^ 2 9 MAR 2029 Current iieclion DISPOSING OF THE W.P. AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS