AMIT KUMAR SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/42806/2024 · 2025-05-05
Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 111942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 111942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72262-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42806 of 2024 Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Satish Kumar Pandey,C.S.C.,Ishan Deo Giri,Mahendra Pratap,Pranjal Mehrotra,Prateek Kumar Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
1. The following prayer has been made in the writ petition:
"I. Issued a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to respondent no. 2 to conclude and decide the application dated 18-11-2024 submitted by the petitioners for paid the compensation amount to real tenants/petitioners after execution of sale deed of Arazi no. 133 K area 0-57 decimal, arazi no. 134 area 0-52 Decimal, arazi no. 181 area 0-65 decimal all situate in Mauja Sultanpur, Pargana- Kopachit Sharki, Tehsil and District Ballia with reason and speaking order, within stipulated time, whereas said land in question have already acquired under the Green Field Project by Competent Authority."
2. Neither in the writ petition nor in the affidavits filed subsequently, there is any disclosure as to under which provision of law, the subject land was acquired by the respondent-Authority.
3. On repeated query from learned counsel for the petitioners, he is unable to reply to the same.
4. Dismissed with liberty to file better petition. (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Ankit. Digitally signed by :- ANKIT VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad