Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11194 (UTT)

YOGESH KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1013/2024 · 2025-03-06

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1013 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Sachin Kr. Sharma, learned counsel i/b Mr. Mohd. Azim, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Bhaskar Ch. Joshi, learned AGA with Mr. Vipul Painuly and Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned B.Hs. for the State. 3. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Today, learned State Counsel has supplied to the Court the instructions received by him, which are taken on record. According to those instructions, on culmination of investigation pursuant to the impugned FIR, Charge-sheet No.322/24 has been submitted against the petitioner. 5. This fact is undisputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. In such view of the matter, present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order dated 13.09.2024 is vacated. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.03.2025 R.Dang