1 2025:CGHC:45818 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 627 of 2024 1 - Atit Kumar Kujur S/o Sushil Kujur, Aged About 34 Years Resident Of Heerapur Imli Tekra Ward No. 11, Police Station- Bharveli, District- Balaghat (M.P.) 2 - Smt. Archana Sharma W/o Rajesh Kumar Sharma Aged About 45 Years (Wrongly Mentioned As D/o Rajesh Kumar Sharma), R/o Kanchan Vihar, Third Floor, Quarter No. B-45, Dumar Talab, Police Station - Amanaka, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Karuna Kujur W/o Sushil Kujur, Aged About 63 Years Resident Of Heerapur Imli Tekra Ward No. 11, Police Station-Bharveli, District- Balaghat (M.P.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Bodhghat, District-Bastar (CG) 2 - Smt. Mona John Kujur W/o Atit Kumar Kujur, Resident Of C/o Aris John, In Front Of Kissan Bakery, Baliram Kashyap Ward No. 29, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.09.10 10:47:01 +0530 2 (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioners : Mr. Krishna Kumar Dewangan, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 09.09.2025 1. The present CRMP has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer :- “It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quash impugned FIR No. 102/2023 and final report arising out of the impugned FIR, in the interest of justice accordingly.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the charges have been framed against the present petitioners by the learned trial Court, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition to which learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take appropriate recourse to law, if cause of action arises in future. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed. 3 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice S. Bhilwar