BHIMADOLE LAKSHMI v. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
WP/6482/2025 · 2025-05-08
Challa Gunaranjan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11194 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11194 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
“'v J0i IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATi (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE A & PRESENT Cl'-- THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 6482 OF 2025 Between:
1. Bhimadole Lakshmi, W/o Srinivasa Rao Aged about 44yrs, Occ; School Assistant (Telugu) Kasturiba Municipal Corporation Girls High School R/o C/o Engineer Pragathigari House IBM Church, Teachers Colony Vennavallivaripet, Eluru Eluru District
2. Smt. Shaik Marks Mao, W/o Shaik Mustafa Ali Aged about 52yrs, Occ: School Assistant (Telugu) Kasturiba Municipal Corporation Girls High School R/o Plot No. 101, Teichers’ Enclave Satrampadu, Eluru, Eluru District
3. R. Abbulu, S/o Polayya Aged about 47yrs, Occ: School Assistant (Telugu) Kasturiba Municipal Corporation Girls High School R/o 3rd Street, Lankapeta, Eluru, Eluru District ...PETITIONERS AND
1. The District Educational Officen Eluru, Eluru District
2. The Commissioner of School Education, Government Pradesh, Vijayawada, NTR District. 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, s
4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 5. The Eluru Municipal Corporation, Eluru, Eluru District Rep by Municipal Commissioner of Andhra its
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No.1 in issuing the Impugned Proceedings in Rc.No.1059/B3/2024-1 & Rc.No.1059/B3/2024-2 all are dated 10-03-2025 respectively in reverting the Petitioners from the post of School Assistant may Rc.No.1059/B3/2024, (Telugu) to the post of Language Pandit (Telugu) and transferring different High Schools as SGT against post as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to G.O.Ms.No.82 Finance (HR-II) Department dated 16-05-2017 and of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Cohstitution of India and aside to violation consequently set the Impugned Proceedings in NO.1059/B3/2024-1 and Rc.No.1059/B3/2024-2, all are dated 10-03-2025 issued by the 1st Respondent in the interest of justice. Rc.No.1059/B3/2024, Rc;
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Impugned Proceedings in Rc.
NO.1059/B3/2024, Rc.No.1059/B3/2024-1 & Rc.No.ld59/B3/2024-2, all are dated 10-03-2025 issued by the 1st Respondent by directing the respondents to continue the petitioners as School Assistant (Telugu) in Kasturiba Municipal Corporation Girls’ High School, Eluru pending disposal of the Writ Petition interest of justice. in the Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI R NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3: GP FOR SERVICES Counsel for the Respondent No. 4; GP FOR SERVICES I
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SMT. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI, SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010128672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] I r;
FRIDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 6482/2025 Between; Bhimadole Lakshmi and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The District Educational Officer and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR SERVICES I 2.GPFOR SERVICES II The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition with better affidavit.
2. Permission as sought for is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file fresh writ petition. No order as to costs.
A 2 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed. I Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// / To, SECTION OFFICER
1. One CC to Sri P Nagendra Reddy Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP for Services II, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
3. Two CCs to GP for Services I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
4. One CC to Smt. Municipalities, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Three CD Copies [OUT] [OUT] Rani Vallabhaneni, SC Sireesha for TF
1 HIGH COURT DATED:09/05/2025 \
ORDER WP.No.6482 of 2025 X 10 SEP 2025 ‘ Current Section ml DIS^SSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT