Routhu Lakshman Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/7381/2021 · 2025-09-16
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11193 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11193 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010128552021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7381/2021 Between:
1. ROUTHU LAKSHMAN RAO, S/O APPALA NARASAYYA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, RIO D.NO.12-0-01, NEW RAJIV NAGAR, PAYAKAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA POLICE COMMISSIONERATE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, LAW AND ORDER (NORTH ZONE), VIJAYAWADA POLICE COMMISSIONERATE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TASK FORCE, VIJAYAWADA POLICE COMMISSIONERATE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NUNNA RURAL POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of
2
Writ of Mandamus declaring the Proceedings of the 5th Respondent, Circle Inspector of Police, Nunna Rural Police Station, Vijayawada, vide C.No. 228/2012, dt- 22.03.2012 is illegal and void as not based on facts and for non- application of mind, and also the extension of the same year after year to the detriment of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unwarranted and in gross violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Proceedings of the 5th respondent Circle Inspector of Police, Nunna Rural Police Station, vide No.228 of 2012, dt- 22.03.2012, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K MALLIKHARJUNA MOORTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME
3
The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“....to issue an Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Proceedings of the 5th Respondent Circle Inspector of Police, Nunna Rural Police Station, Vijayawada vide C.No.228/2012, dt:22.03.2012, is illegal and void as not based on facts and for non-application of mind; and also the extension of the same year after year to the detriment of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unwarranted and in gross violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and to pass....”
2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 4. As the petitioner is not evincing any interest to prosecute the matter, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.09.2025 SNI
4
159 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.7381 of 2021
Dt.17.09.2025
SNI