Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11192 (PAT)

Bijay Yadav @ Vijay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./4561/2025 · 2025-02-24

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4561 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2024 Thana- BARAHAT District- Banka ====================================================== Bijay Yadav @ Vijay Yadav S/o Late Hari Yadav @ Late Sukdev Yadav Resident Of Village- Shyam Bazar, Ps - Bounsi, Distt.- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that this petitioner along with other F.I.R. named accused persons entered the house constructed on Khatiyani land of the father of informant and started abusing and assaulting informant by means of danda, khani, bricks and stones. This petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant on his head by means of khanti and when bhabhi of the informant came to save him, she was also assaulted and co-accused Narmada Devi snatched her gold chain. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4561 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2025 2/2 account of existing land dispute, an altercation took place between the parties. Case and counter case. Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the backdrop of the case, nature of accusation, simple injury and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st, Banka in connection with Barahat P. S. Case No. 169 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T