Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010127972019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 5627/2019
Between:
1. C.GAFOOR,, S/O C.ALLI SAB, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU NAGAR, (A.NARAYANAPURAM), ANANTHAPURAM
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT AT ANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, IV TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. SRIKANTAM SRINIVASULU, OCC-ENGINEER, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more
2 particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering the FIR basing on the petitioner's complaint dated 29.3.2019 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently direct the 3rd respondents to register FIR and conduct investigation into the offences in the complaint
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to register the FIR basing on the petitioner's complaint dated 29.3.2019, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NARASIMHULU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5627 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that the preliminary enquiry of the Police would reveal that the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is of civil in nature and therefore, they will not interfere in such civil dispute. 3. Recoding the submission made by learned Additional Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate for necessary relief in the light of the Judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in M.Subramaniam Vs. S.Janaki and another1. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 13.08.2025 PSA
1 2020 (16) SCC 728
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 5627 of 2019
Date: 13.08.2025 PSA