Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11189 (CHH)

ASHUTOSH AGRAWAL v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

MCC/221/2025 · 2025-03-05

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(M.C.C.No.221/2025) 2025:CGHC:10894 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 221 of 2025 Ashutosh Agrawal, S/o Late Shri Kumbhaj Lal Agrawal, Presently aged about 59 years, Presently residing at, Maltidevi Rice Mill, Raipur Road, Simga, Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh (Petitioner) ... Applicant versus 1. National Highway Authority of India, Through Chairman, G5, G6 Sector 10, Dwarka, New Delhi – 110075 2. The Regional Manager, National Highway Authority of India, Plot No.159, Bungalow No.1, Shubhankar Apartments, Ramnagar, Ambazari Hilltop, Nagpur – 440033, Maharashtra 3. Project Director, National Highway Authority of India, House No.5196, Behind BTIT College, Shankar Nagar, Raipur 492007 4. Project Director, National Highway Authority of India, D-61, HIG-1 (Akash, Abhilasha Parisar), Behind Hightech Bus Stand, Tifra, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5. Competent Authority under NHAI/Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Revenue), Bhatapara, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh (Respondents) ... Non-applicants For Applicant : Mr. Ankit Singhal, Advocate. For Non-applicants No.1 to 4/NHAI : Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate. For Non-applicant No.5/State : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Government Advocate. SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2025.03.07 16:52:59 +0530 (M.C.C.No.221/2025) Single Bench Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 05/03/2025 1. The present MCC has been filed for correction in the order dated 17- 2-2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C)Nos.316/2020 & 328/2020, on 25-2-2025 pointing out some clerical & typographical mistakes. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on due consideration, in the interest of justice, the MCC is allowed and the order is corrected as follows: - 1. 5,32,42,816/- mentioned in sixth line of page 4 of the subject ₹ order be read as 5,53,62,816/- ₹ . 2. 24-1-2020 mentioned in sixth line of page 5 of the subject order be read as 13-1-2020. 3. 5,32,42,816/- mentioned in ninth line from bottom of page 5 ₹ of the subject order be read as 5,28,28,061/- ₹ . 4. 79,56,864/- mentioned in seventh line from bottom of page 5 ₹ of the subject order be read as 75,90,870/- ₹ . 5. 24-1-2020 mentioned in fifth line of para 4 of the subject order be read as 13-1-2020. 6. Civil Appeal No.7064/2013 mentioned in second line of para 14 of the subject order be read as Civil Appeal No.7064/ 2019 (M.C.C.No.221/2025) 7. W.P.(C)No.310/2010 mentioned in first line of para 17 of the subject order be read as W.P.(C)No.316/2020. 8. 31-1-2020 mentioned in 11th line of para 19 of the subject order be read as 13-1-2020. 3. In view of typographical mistakes crept in the order dated 17-2-2025, the order as uploaded in W.P.(C)Nos.316/2020 & 328/2020 stands corrected and instead thereof, the corrected order be uploaded and the corrected order signed today be made part of the record of W.P.(C) Nos.316/2020 & 328/2020. Previously uploaded order be deleted from the CIS. However, the original order passed in the writ petitions as it is along with a copy of the order passed in the instant MCC would remain in the record of W.P.(C)Nos.316/2020 & 328/2020. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Soma