2025:HHC:14248 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Revision No. 103 of 2019 Date of decision: 16 .5 .202 5 M/s Remed Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. ….Petitioner. Versus Tarun Attri. ….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr.N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner. For the Respondent: Mr.Ishan Kashyap, Advocate. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that dispute in present matter stands settled and in terms of settlement, respondent has withdrawn the suit filed by him for recovery of use and occupation charges against present petitioner/tenant. Petitioner/tenant has also handed over the possession of the premises in reference to the landlord/respondent and as on date no dispute remains between the petitioner/tenant and respondent/landlord, to be adjudicated and, therefore, he has instructions to withdraw this petition in view of subsequent events referred supra. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes 2025:HHC:14248 CR No. 103 of 2019 2. In view of above, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s) also stand disposed of in the same terms. 3. Needless to say that if there is any unsettled dispute with respect to use and occupation charges, respondent/landlord shall be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy for recovery of the same. (Vivek Singh Thakur), 16th May, 2025 Judge. (Keshav) 2