Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11181 (JHR)

MS NATIONAL MINIERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER COAL ANURAG CHOUBEY v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH NOMINATE AUTHORITY

WPC/1590/2022 · 2025-08-20

Arun Kumar Rai, Sujit Narayan Prasad

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:24352-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1590 of 2022 ----- M/s National Mineral Development Corporation (NMDC) through its General Manager (COAL), Anurag Choubey, aged about 57 years, S/o late N.N. Choubey 2nd Floor, Jharkhand State Food Corporation Building, Kadru, PO and PS Argora, District Ranchi … Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India through Nominate Authority, Office at Ministry of Coal, Room No. 120, F.Wi9ng, PO and PS Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi-110001. 2. M/s GVK Power (Goindwal Sahib) Limited through Managing Director Office at Plot No. 156-159, PO and PS Paigah House 10, Sardar Patel Road, District Secunderabad-500003, State Telangana 3. M/s Essar Power M P Ltd. (EPMPL) through its resolution professional Grant Thornton, 11th Floor, Tower II. One International Center, PO and PS- S.B. Marg, Elphintone (W), Mumbai 400013. … … Respondents ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amrendra Pradhan, Advocate For the UOI : Mr. Anil Kumar, ASGI; Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, CGC For the Resp. No.3 : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate; Ms. Prerna Jhunjhunwala, Advocate ------ Order No.11/Dated: 20th August, 2025 1. Mr. Amrendra Pradhan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instruction, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition on the ground that this Court has already been agitated and now pending before the Tribunal under section 27 of the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015. It is further submitted that withdrawal of the writ petition may not prejudice the pending litigation before the learned Tribunal. 2. No objection has been raised by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the private respondent. 3. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as sought for. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) KNR/