Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11178 (JHR)

RAHAT RAJ ALIAS RAHAT KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3160/2025 · 2025-04-22

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:11931 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3160 of 2025 ------ Rahat Raj @ Rahat Kumar Singh, aged about 22 years, son of Sri Thakur Baljeet Kumar Singh @ Pintu Singh, resident of E/98, Road No.16, Near Panch Mandir, Patratu Thermal Power Station, P.O. & P.S. Patratu, District-Ramgarh (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... ....Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate : Mr. Anjani Nandan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 22-04-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Argora P.S. Case No.33 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 108 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has abetted the commission of suicide of Shristi Singh. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that there is no overt act attributed to the petitioner which could have led the deceased to commit suicide. It is next submitted that in the alleged suicide note she herself recommended that nothing should be done with the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-12 of this bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.02.2025 as is evident from para-05 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-XIII, Ranchi in connection with Argora P.S. Case No.33 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/