Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 111761 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/12053/2024 · 2025-01-21

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:10455 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 12053 of 2024 Applicant :- Ajay Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mahipal Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ashish Jaiswal,G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants; learned A.G.A. for State and perused the record. 2. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants in Case Crime No.447 of 2024, under Sections 333, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109 B.N.S., P.S. Thakurdwara, District Moradabad, during pendency of trial. 3. After arguing the matter to some extent, learned counsel for applicants submits that present anticipatory bail application may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. 4. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the applicants, namely, Ajay Kumar and Sumit Kumar appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and apply for regular bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 5. For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them. 6. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad