Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 111718 (ALL)

SHASHANK KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WTAX/2327/2024 · 2025-03-11

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36599-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 2327 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shashank Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vineet Sankalp Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner and Sri Vineet Sankalp, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondent authorities in considering the representation of the petitioner dated November 09, 2022. 3. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.4/Commercial Tax Officer, Varanasi should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner dated November 09, 2022. 4. Accordingly, the respondent no.4/Commercial Tax Officer, Varanasi is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner dated November 09, 2022 within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 12.3.2025 Virendra (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad