2025:HHC:1856 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No:6992 of 2020 Decided On : 09th January, 2025 __________________________________________________________ Harmeek Singh & ors. ...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & anr. ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioners : Ms. Supriya Chaudary, Advocate vice Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] On Mention-Memo, learned vice counsel appearing for original counsel Mr. Vikrant Thakur, on instructions states that the petitioners intend to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file afresh, if so desire. 2. Even, the prayer being innocuous is not opposed, by Learned State Counsel. 3. In above backdrop, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, as aforesaid. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2025:HHC:1856 - 2 - Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ranjan Sharma) January 09, 2025 Judge (Shivender)