Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[3369] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH ll^/O THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE I MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2805 OF 2025 Betwee n :
1. M. Raghubathi, S/o Muthusamy, aged 27 years, Melkanavayur Village, Khilkanayavur post, Kanamalai Panchayat, Jamanamarthur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District, TamI'l Nadu State. 2. Damodharan, S/o Raman, aged 29 years, D.No.87, Melmurukamandai Village, Nagalur Post, Kanamalai Panchayat, Jamanamarthur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District, Tamil Nadu State. 3. D. Venkatesan, S/o Durisamy, aged 30 years, Melmurukamandai Village, Nagalur Post, Kanamalai Panchayat, Jamanamarthur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai DistrI'Ct, Tamil Nadu State. 4. D. VenkateshperumaI, S/o Duraisamy, aged 29 years, Melmurukamandai village, Nagalur Post, Kanamalai Panchayat, Jamanamarthur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District, Tamil Nadu State. 5. Baskaran Raji, S/o Raji, aged 34 years, Melsabagathope Village, Nagalur Post, Kanamalai Panchayat, Jamanamarthur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District, Tamil Nadu State. 6. C. Sathiyan, S/o Chinnapaiyan, aged 19 years, D.No. 38, Valliyur Village, Namilyampatte post and panchayat, Jamanamarthur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District, Tamil Nadu State. Petitioner/Accused No.1 to 6
AND I. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravati through Station House Officer, RSASTF Police station Tirupati, Chittoor District. Respondent/Complainant petition under section 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023 is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the Petitioners/ A-1 to A-6 on Bail in connection with cr.No.7 of 2025 of RSASTF Police Station, Tirupati, Chittoor District. The petition/Appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments Of Sri SRINIVASU L Advocate for the PetitioneS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) for the Respondent and the Court made the following.
APHCO10128572025 E#E] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2805/2025 Between.I M. Raghubathi and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State OfAndhra ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.SRINIVASU L Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the foIIowincI Order: This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of BNSS, has been filed by the petitioners herein/Al to A6, seeking I regular bail, in Crime No.07 of 2025 of RSASTF Police Station, Tirupati, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2) read with 3(5), 49 and 61(2) of the BNS and Sections 20(1)(d)(i)(a) read with 20(1)(c), ii, iii, iv, x, 36(a) read with 32A of the A.P. Forest (Amendment) Act, 2016. 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that this is a case of criminal conspiracy, abetment to commit the offence, trespass into reserve forest without permission, cut the live red sander trees and committed theft and trying to shift by loading for the purpose of smuggling red sander logs that occurred on 04.02.2025 at 06.00 cz_3Z:Zff3f}
2 I. a.m., near Jorikona Reserve Forest, VeeraballI' Forest Beat, Sanipai Section and Range, in which accused Nos.1 to 6 were arrested and 09 red sander logs, weighing{ 281 Kgs and 06 cell phones were seized from their possession. 3. Heard. Perused the record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitl®oners submits that the petitiorlerS herein are COOlieS and they are no way connected with the offence alleged and they have been falsely implicated in the present crime. 5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that Al and A2 are l'nvolved in other crime and A3 to A6 have no previous criminal antecedents. 6. Considering the nature of offence and considering the fact that no previous antecedents have been reported against A3 to A6, this Court is inclined to consider the petition in respect of A3 to A6 with the following conditions. 7.
The PetitionerNos.3 to 6/A3 toA6 shall be released on bail on their executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each with two sureties of the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class-Gum-Spec,+al Court for Trial of Cases relating to +Red Sanders Smuggling, Tirupati. On release, petitioner Nos.3 to 6/A3 -+- I_-
3 J/ to A6 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, once in a-week i.e. on every sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 01.00 p.m., for a period of three (3) months and they shall co- operate with the investigation. 8. ln view of involvement of Al and A2 in other crime, the petition in respect of petitioner Nos.1 and 2/Al and A2 is dismissed. 9. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is partly allowed. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. `J For Tol `R ` ?\ //TRUE COPY// .SD/-G.HELANAIDU ASSISTA SECTl TRAR
1. The Judicial Magistrate of FirstClass-cum-Spl. Court of Trial of Cases relating to Red Sanders Smuggling, Tirupati. 2. The Superintendent, Sub-Jail, Tirupati. 3. The Station House Officer, RSASTF Police Station, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 4. One CC to SRl. SRINIVASU L Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two cos to Public Prosecutor (AP) High Court of A.P., Amaravati [OUT]. 6. One spare copy
iii HIGH COURT TMR,J DATED :24/03/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.2805 of 2025 ALLOWED E31 rri r_ I M«R 4u4-D I:: _: I:_ ----i:.;--`-: :-I:--