Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11160 (ALL)

DR. ABHIMANYU ARJUN KOTHULE AND 7 OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/957/2025 · 2025-01-31

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:14692 Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 957 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Abhimanyu Arjun Kothule And 7 Others Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devaang Savla,Shubham,Udayan Nandan Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Ashish Kumar Ojha,Vinay Kumar Singh Along with Case :- WRIT - A No. - 695 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Kajol Deepak Jaiswal Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarvesh Kumar Dubey,Saumitra Anand Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Ashish Kumar Ojha,Rajesh Tripathi And Case :- WRIT - A No. - 614 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Shesadev Dash Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarvesh Kumar Dubey,Saumitra Anand Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Ashish Kumar Ojha,Rajesh Tripathi And Case :- WRIT - A No. - 625 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Sreenivasacharya Chigurala Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarvesh Kumar Dubey,Saumitra Anand Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Ashish Kumar Ojha,Rajesh Tripathi And Case :- WRIT - A No. - 627 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Suheba Belwadi Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarvesh Kumar Dubey,Saumitra Anand Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Ashish Kumar Ojha,Rajesh Tripathi And Case :- WRIT - A No. - 666 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr Souvagya Ranjan Parija Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarvesh Kumar Dubey,Saumitra Anand Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Ashish Kumar Ojha,Rajesh Tripathi Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. Heard S/Sri Udayan Nandan, Devaang Savla and Shubham, learned counsels for petitioner, Sri Ashish Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 4, S/Sri Vinay Kumar Singh and Rajesh Tripathi, learned counsel for Union of India. In order to avoid any further ambiguity and since it has been informed to this Court that some of petitioners and other aggrieved persons have filed first appeal against impugned order which are rejected and some of effective persons have filed second appeal which are still pending, whereas some of petitioners have approached directly before this Court and, therefore, the fair submission of counsels for petitioner is accepted that petitioners who have still not filed first appeal in terms of relevant provisions be permitted to file first appeal within two weeks, which shall be decided thereafter within two weeks. It is further observed that appeals be decided on its own merit and may not be rejected only on ground that some earlier first appeals were rejected, if facts so warrants. So far as, petitioners who have approached this Court at the stage of rejection of first appeal, they are permitted to file second appeal if so advised. The second appeal can be filed within six weeks which will be decided on basis of merit of case thereafter within a short period. Opening of portal will remain subject to outcome of first appeal and second appeal, as the case may be. Accordingly, writ petitions are disposed of with aforesaid observation. Order Date :- 31.1.2025/P. Pandey Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad