Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11159 (UTT)

KAMLESH SINGH CHAUHAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2086/2021 · 2025-05-02

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2086 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuli and Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A.s’ with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous, as charge sheet has been submitted in the matter on 14.06.2022. 4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid charge sheet before appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 02.05.2025 SK