Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 111526 (ALL)

RAJENDRA SINGH AND 20 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/21028/2024 · 2025-03-17

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:38288 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 21028 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rajendra Singh And 20 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Janardhan Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard Sri Janardan Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner wants that his salary should be re- fixed taking into previous service period that he has rendered in Army prior to joining U.P. Police department. 3. It is submitted that this controversy of counting period of service already rendered in Indian Army is no more res integra and in many writ petitions, directions have been issued for counting period of service already rendered in army. He has further submitted that a writ petition was disposed of being Writ A No. 20883 of 2022 by this Court vide order dated 14.12.2022 following judgment and order passed in case of Hari Chand and Others v. State of U.P. and Others passed in Writ A No. 36642 of 2015 on 23rd August, 2016 and in the case of Bimal Kumar Singh and Others v. State of U.P. and Others passed in Writ A No. 12064 of 2021 on 1st November, 2021. 4. Learned Standing Counsel does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. In view of above, this petition stands disposed of in terms of judgment passed in various petitions quoted herein- above. The authority shall be taking decision within a maximum period of three months from the date presentation of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Deepika Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad