Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 111522 (ALL)

PRASHANT GAURAV SINGH v. SMT. ANEETA @ PRITI

A227/15726/2024 · 2025-07-15

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115628 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 15726 of 2024 Petitioner :- Prashant Gaurav Singh Respondent :- Smt. Aneeta @ Priti Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. As per office report dated 17.4.2025, neither acknowledgment nor undelivered cover has returned. 2. Service is found sufficient. 3. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 6.11.2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.5, Ghaziabad in Case No.2507 of 2019 by which the written statement filed by the opposite party has been taken on record. 4. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that written statement has been filed with the delay of 1260 days. It has been further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the Court below has erroneously taken the written statement on record which was filed with much delay. 5. Perused the order passed by the Tribunal. 6. The Tribunal has recorded the finding that opposite party has sufficiently explained the reason for filing delay in the written statement. 7. There is no infirmity in the reasons recorded by the Family Court, therefore, no illegality has been committed by the Family Court in passing the order impugned. 8. The writ petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad