Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11152 (GAU)

MANOJ PATNI v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/2245/2024 · 2025-03-04

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010065372024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case : WP(C)/2245/2024 MANOJ PATNI SON OF LATE CHANDANMAL PATNI AS SELF AND PROPRIETOR OF M/S SANMATI TRADERS HAVING THEIR BUSINESS AT IMPHAL WEST MANIPUR AS WELL AS HOUSE NO. 12 GROUND FLOOR KALPATRU PATH RUKMINI NAGAR BEHIND GNRC HOSPITAL KAMRUP METROPOLITAN GUWAHATI- 781006. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI- 110001. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE (TAXATION) DEPARTMENT DISPUR Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI- 781006. 3:THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE GST BHAWAN KEDAR ROAD GUWAHATI- 781001. 4:THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX KAR BHAWAN BISHNU PRASAD RAVA FLYOVER DISPUR GANESHGURI GUWAHATI- 781006. 5:THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX GUWAHATI-D-10- GUWAHATI-D GUWAHATI ASSAM. 6:THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS 1ST FLOOR TOWER NBCC PLAZA 1 SECTOR-5 PUSHP VIHAR NEW DELHI- 110017. 7:THE CHAIRPERSON GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COUNCIL 5TH FLOOR TOWER-II JEEVAN BHARTI BUILDING JANPATH ROAD CONNAUGHT PLACE NEW DELHI- 110001. ------------ Advocate for : MR. DEVENDR SARAF Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE Page No.# 3/3 ORDER Date : 05.03 . 2025 Mr. S.S. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has on instruction to withdraw this writ petition. Therefore, prays that same may be allowed to withdraw with liberty to file a fresh. Mr. S. C. Keyal, learned standing counsel, GST and Mr. B. Gogoi, learned standing counsel, Finance for the respondents are present. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant