[2025:RJ-JP:73] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3154/2007 Pyare Lal S/o Shri Bhairo Lal, Village Darra, Post Rodhai, Tehsil Mandarayal, District Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan Through The Secretary, Deptt. Of Home Affairs, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Superintendent of Police, District Karauli, Karauli. 3. The Inspector General of Police, Bharatpur Range, Bharatpur. 4. Deputy Inspector General of Police Personnel, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anukriti Sharma for Mr. Yogesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 02/01/2025 1. From the record, it appears that the petitioner has not filed the required PF and notices to respondents since 11.05.2007. 2. With the consent of counsel for petitioner, the writ petition has been heard on merits. 3. By means of instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has impugned the order dated 27.07.2005 (Annx.19) passed by the Superintendent of Police, District Karauli, relieving the petitioner from service in exercise of powers under Rule 53(1) of Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1996 (for short, “Rules of 1996”). [2025:RJ-JP:73] (2 of 2) [CW-3154/2007] 4. From the pleadings of the writ petition and the documents enclosed therewith, it appears that the petitioner was assigned duties as Investigating Officer and to search a missing children. Petitioner miserably failed to discharge his duties as also flouted the instructions/ orders of his superior Officers. It appears that the Superintendent of Police, having satisfied with the requirement of Rule 53(1) of Rules of 1996 that petitioner has completed 15 years of qualifying service and has attained the age of 50 years as much as his services in the Police Department are fruitless rather he has become a dead wood, he was given compulsory retirement. 5. Petitioner has miserably failed to establish that the order impugned was passed arbitrarily, maliciously or for extraneous reasons as punishment or without application of mind. The order impugned has been passed by the Competent Authority. This Court does not find any material on record, to interfere with the impugned order dated 27.07.2005 (Annx.19) in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 6. In view of above, the writ petition is devoid of merits and same is hereby dismissed. 7. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/24