Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 111480 (PNJ)

BALWINDER SINGH v. AUTHAM INVESTMENT INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED PRESENTLY KNOWN AS RELIANCE COMMERCIAL FINANCE LTD

CWP/31616/2025 · 2025-10-24

Parmod Goyal, Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

202 BALWINDER SINGH AUTHAM INVESTMENT INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED PRESENTLY KNOWN AS RELIANCE COMMERCIAL FINANCE LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL 1. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 08.10.2025 (Annexure P Presiding Officer, DRT, Chandigarh under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 along with IA seeking stay and the order of taking possession dated 24.04.2025 (Annexure P respondent No.3 along with impugned notices under Section 13(2 17.10.2024 (Annexure P issued by respondent Act, 2002 dated 10.09.2025 (Annexure P 2. Mr. Vipul Dharmani, Advocate has pu respondents No.1 and 2 and filed 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not adhere to the undertaking given withdrawal of the 4. Prayer is accepted. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn. 24.10.2025 NainaRajput Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH BALWINDER SINGH VERSUS AUTHAM INVESTMENT INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED PRESENTLY KNOWN AS RELIANCE COMMERCIAL FINANCE LTD. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Mr. HBS Juneja, Advocate for the petitioner. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) * * * * The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 08.10.2025 (Annexure P Presiding Officer, DRT, Chandigarh dismissing the Scrutinization Application under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 along with IA seeking stay and the order of taking possession dated 24.04.2025 (Annexure P respondent No.3 along with impugned notices under Section 13(2 7.10.2024 (Annexure P-1), Section 13 (4) dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure P issued by respondent-Bank and impugned notice under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 dated 10.09.2025 (Annexure P-6) issued by respondent No.4. Mr. Vipul Dharmani, Advocate has pu respondents No.1 and 2 and filed vakalatnama, which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not adhere to the undertaking given before this Court on 23.10.2025 withdrawal of the present petition. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn. Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-31616-2025 Date of Decision: 24.10.2025 ….PETITIONER(S) AUTHAM INVESTMENT INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED PRESENTLY KNOWN AS ….RESPONDENT(S) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL , Advocate for the petitioner. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 08.10.2025 (Annexure P-7) passed by Ld. dismissing the Scrutinization Application under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 along with IA seeking stay and the order of taking possession dated 24.04.2025 (Annexure P-5) passed by respondent No.3 along with impugned notices under Section 13(2) dated 1), Section 13 (4) dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure P-2) Bank and impugned notice under Section 14 of SARFAESI 6) issued by respondent No.4. Mr. Vipul Dharmani, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of , which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not adhere to the on 23.10.2025. He seeks permission for (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE (PARMOD GOYAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2025 Date of Decision: 24.10.2025 ….PETITIONER(S) ….RESPONDENT(S) The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for 7) passed by Ld. dismissing the Scrutinization Application under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 along with IA seeking stay and the 5) passed by dated 2) Bank and impugned notice under Section 14 of SARFAESI t in appearance on behalf of Learned counsel for the petitioner could not adhere to the permission for NAINA KATHIAT 2025.10.24 15:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document